Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 February 2014

Climate change; did I do it?





I was a skeptic; I didn't believe a word of it. Climate change was just the latest trend in scientific research and people in white lab coats were scrambling to get on the ‘gravy train’ before someone came along and burst the bubble.

Talk of climate change has been in the air for nearly two decades and has raised enormous concern and considerable debate in our information society. Opinion polls showed that there was a peak of support in 2008 followed by a fall in 2010. In fact opinion has moved up and down like the mercury in our thermometers.

 As the oceans warm, storms become much more violent.


According to a survey released in January, 2010 by Yale and George Mason Universities, only about 50percent of Americans were concerned about global warming, less than 50 percent thought humans contributed to it, and more than 43 percent didn’t believe it was happening at all.

In another study published by Yale University in October, 2010 only 57 percent of Americans knew what greenhouse gases are and only half knew they were produced mostly through human activity. Incredibly, 75 percent had never heard of ocean acidification or coral bleaching. It seems strange then that the general population was still in the dark.

Is it really happening?

By June, 2010 Science published the first comprehensive synthesis of climate change studies dealing with the ocean. The startling results were that the rates of change in man-made atmospheric green house gases were driving irreversible and dramatic changes in the way the ocean worked.

Prof. Hoegh-Guldberg, Director of The University of Queensland’s Global Change Institute, predicted dire impacts on hundreds of millions of people around the globe.

"Although there remains active discussion among scientists on many details about the pace and effects of climate change, no leading science organization disagrees that human activities are now changing the Earth's climate. The strong scientific agreement on this point contrasts with the partisan disagreement seen on all of our surveys," said Lawrence Hamilton, professor of sociology and senior fellow with the UNH Carsey Institute.

So what is global warming?
The greenhouse effect was discovered in 1860 by John Tyndall. Since the early 20th century, the average temperature of the Earth has increased about 0.8oC and most of this has happened since 1980. In statistical terms we are about 95 percent sure that the warming is from greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuel and cutting forests. The biggest contributors are electricity, industry, and transport (adding up to about 54 percent). This idea is now accepted by the national science organisations of all major industrialized countries.

Greenhouse gases, principally carbon dioxide, absorb heat from the sun and raise the temperature of the atmosphere and ocean. Carbon dioxide has increased by an unbelievable 24 percent in the last 50 years and from polar ice cores we know it is now higher than any time in the last 800 thousand years and probably in the last 20 million years.  Carbon dioxide is expected to reach over 900 parts per million during this century which is an incredible increase of 250 percent since we started burning fossil fuels.


The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) indicated that during the 21st century the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 2.9 °C for their lowest emissions scenario and 2.4 to 6.4 °C for their highest. Because water easily absorbs heat, 93.4 percent of global warming affects the ocean.

These may seem like tiny increases but in fact they are disastrously large. Even small changes in temperature may cause big changes in the climate. We can expect an expansion of deserts and much less rain in parts of the tropics. Melting of the ice caps will change ocean circulation and seafood production. There will be unprecedented extinctions of wildlife on a global scale.

 The impact of global warming is easily seen in these satellite photos of the Arctic.


This all sounds pretty awful but to many people it is seen as just another inconvenience. Life will go on with ‘business as usual’. Flooding of the major cities by the end of the century; I’ll be dead by then!

The problem is that an awful lot of people may be dead a lot sooner and it won’t be business as usual at all.

Where is it going to ‘hurt’ the most?

It is estimated that a global rise in temperature of only 1.5-2 °C will bring about the catastrophic extinction of many of the Earth’s species. We aren’t just talking about species we don’t ‘need’ or don’t ‘like’. In one study published in Nature in 2004, between 15 and 37% of 1103 endemic or near-endemic known plant and animal species will be "committed to extinction" by 2050. 
But climate change is only starting. Global warming will catapult the Earth and our society into entirely new situations with new rules. Even a 2 °C rise above the pre-industrial level will be outside the range of temperatures experienced by human civilization.
In the tropical seas coral reefs and their fisheries simply will not survive the temperature rise. Coral bleaching, which kills coral, occurs with rises of as little as 1 °C above the summer maximum. Without corals the food web of reefs and the populations of people who depend on them will collapse.

Coral bleaching happens when corals expel their food producing algae. Starvation is the result.

Coral reefs are already the world’s most endangered ecosystem supporting 25 percent of the ocean’s species. The collapse of these incredibly complex “islands of life” will send not a ripple but a ‘tsunami of change’ through the oceans of the world and through Coral Triangle and Pacific Island communities where some 200 million people are sustained by tropical fisheries.

The situation may be even worse in the open ocean where tiny drifting creatures like sea butterflies and planktonic animals and plants grow thin calcium shells over their fragile bodies. Even if they cope with the rising temperature, the increased carbon dioxide produces a weak acid in seawater that dissolves their shells and kills them.

The fragile sea butterfly is an important food for most of the world's fisheries.

These frail creatures exist in the trillions and are the food of all the commercial fisheries and most whales. Scientists say that most of these tiny species will be lost by 2065. Between now and then there will be huge disruptions of the ecological food web as species begin to drop out. From about 2065 on we can expect the rapid and catastrophic collapse of most commercial fisheries. The ocean ecosystem will simply fail.

In June, 2010 Science magazine we find that the oceans are now changing at a rate not seen for millions of years. "We are entering a period in which the very ocean services upon which humanity depends are undergoing massive change and in some cases beginning to fail," says Prof. Hoegh-Guldberg. "Further degradation will continue to create enormous challenges and costs for societies worldwide."

The loss of Arctic ice is now so fast that many scientists believe it can not be reversed.

What will happen to us as the earth grows warmer?

UNESCO predicts that 100-150 million people in S.E. Asia alone will be displaced through shoreline erosion, rising sea level, drought, and food shortages by 2050.

Approximately 40% of the world's agricultural land was already seriously degraded in 2007. If current trends of soil degradation continue as they are in Africa, underdeveloped countries might be able to feed just 25% of their population by 2025 (based on UNU's Ghana-based Institute for Natural Resources in Africa).



Africa, small islands, and Asian mega-deltas are regions that are likely to be badly affected. Rainfall in much of S.E. Asia will be very much less and many areas will become much drier or deserts including Indonesia, Malaysia, and Borneo.
This may seem like an inconvenience to some but to people living in agricultural and subsistence economies throughout the tropics this is bad news. The impact of global warming will be disproportionately large for disadvantaged communities where resources, food, and health are already problems (Environmental Justice, Dec. 2009).

"We are becoming increasingly certain that the world's marine ecosystems are approaching tipping points. These tipping points are where change accelerates and causes unrelated impacts on other systems, the results of which we really have no power or model to foresee."

Prof. Hoegh-Guldberg concludes: "These challenges underscore the urgency with which world leaders must act to limit further growth of greenhouse gases and thereby reduce the risk of these events occurring. Ignoring the science is not an option."

I am not alone in my belief that we are on the brink of environmental catastrophe and have been joined in my concerns by 155 senior marine scientists from 26 countries who recently signed the Monaco Declaration (The Royal Society, 6 July 2009), highlighting the twin threat of growing ocean acidification and global warming.
It took me most of my childhood to be able to admit mistakes and say “I did it”. Looking back at the way we have lived and wasted the resources of this world we have to admit it is our fault; there is no doubt; we did it. The question now is will we accept responsibility for repairing the damage. Time is running out.

-----------------------




If you are interested in some of the latest topics in ocean conservation check out some of the other posts on this site.





Sunday, 29 September 2013

Bad News for Me and Polar Bears? By Dr. Gerry Goeden

















Gerry is a Malaysian based marine ecologist, Research Fellow and Advisor to the National University of Malaysia, and marine consultant to the Andaman Resort, Langkawi.




 Sea ice is disappearing at an alarming rate.




Sea ice scientists working in the Arctic say it's not a question of "if" there will be nearly ice-free summers, but "when." The news is that "when" is sooner than we thought -- before 2050 and possibly within the next decade or two. Using three different modelling techniques they came up with an ice free Arctic by 2020, 2030, or 2050.

James Overland and Muyin Wang, both of NOAA, published their extraordinary results in Geophysical Research Letters April 12, 2013. 

 In another study from the Bjerknes Centre (January14, 2013) it was confirmed that Arctic sea ice is shrinking in both thickness and extent at an alarming rate. Most of this is attributable to human activities that add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere; our burning fossil fuel.


 The Arctic may be ice free by 2020.



Sound like bad news for polar bears?  Actually it’s bad news for all of us. I live only a few hundred kilometres from the equator and will be among the hardest hit by this change to the Arctic Ice. Here’s why.

As the ice thins and breaks it is lost through the Fram Strait between Svalbard and Greenland. Last year’s movement of ice through the Fram Strait was huge and the Arctic ice in 2012 was the least on record. 

A paper published in March’s Nature Climate Change by Richard Pearson, lead author and scientist at the American Museum of Natural History's Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, predicts that as the ice goes from the land, wooded areas will increase by as much as 50% in the next few decades. Green forests absorb the sun’s energy rather than reflecting it back into space like ice does. The same is true of the sea; it will also absorb more heat without an icy covering.

Dr. Pearson’s team found that a phenomenon called the albedo effect, based on the Earth’s reflectivity, would have a runaway impact on the greening Arctic and “—extend far beyond the Arctic region”.

As more sunlight is absorbed the temperature increases even further melting yet more ice. This has a positive feedback to an already warming climate: the more vegetation there is the more warming will occur. And higher temperatures mean even more vegetation.

"By incorporating observed relationships between plants and albedo, we show that vegetation distribution shifts will result in an overall positive feedback to climate that is likely to cause greater warming than has previously been predicted," said co-author Scott Goetz, of the Woods Hole Research Center.

What this means is that melting Arctic ice is no longer evidence of a rapidly warming planet; it’s now part of the cause of global warming.

The March Geophysical Research Letters presented the alarming results for a study of Canada’s Arctic Archipelago showing an ice loss of at least 20% and warming of 8 degrees Centigrade by the end of the century.

Lead author Dr Jan Lenaerts of Utrecht University says, "Even if we assume that global warming is not happening quite so fast, it is still highly likely that the ice is going to melt at an alarming rate. The chances of it growing back are very slim."

Scientists say that the pattern of ocean circulation was radically altered in the past when climates were warmer. Ancient warm periods offer insights into future warming. The mid-Pliocene, 3 million years ago, was a period of global warmth that is often considered as an analogue for our future.

 
 Weather patterns are going to change and storms will be much more powerful

During this past warm period, unusually hot surface conditions existed in the northern hemisphere. Models of the Earth’s energy flow point to radically different weather patterns and ocean currents. The loss of the Arctic sea ice will change the Arctic Ocean and the movement of water on a global scale.

Africa, small islands, and Asian mega-deltas are regions that are likely to be badly affected. Rainfall in much of S.E. Asia will be very much less and many areas will become much drier or deserts including Indonesia, Malaysia, and Borneo. It is estimated that a global rise in temperature of only 1.5-2 °C will bring about the catastrophic extinction of 20-30% of the Earth’s species.


 

This may seem like an inconvenience to some but to people living in agricultural and subsistence economies throughout the tropics this is bad news. The impact of global warming will be disproportionately large for disadvantaged communities where resources, food, and health are already problems (Environmental Justice, Dec. 2009).

A study by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2009) estimated the effect of climate change on human health to date. Climate change was estimated to have been responsible for 3% of diarrhoea, 3% of malaria, and 3.8% of dengue fever deaths worldwide in 2004. Total attributable mortality was about 0.2% of all deaths in 2004; of these, 85% were child deaths. 

But climate change is only starting. The loss of the Arctic ice cap will catapult the Earth and our society into entirely new situations with new rules. Even a 2 °C rise above the pre-industrial level would be outside the range of temperatures experienced by human civilization. 

In the tropical seas coral reefs and their fisheries simply will not survive the temperature rise. Coral bleaching, which kills coral, occurs with rises of as little as 1 °C above the summer maximum. Without corals the food web of reefs will collapse.

Coral reefs occupy only 0.15% of the oceans and yet support about 25% of its species. We know almost nothing about reefs but believe that they have far reaching effects on the whole of the sea. 

The collapse of these incredibly complex ecosystems will send not a ripple but a ‘tsunami of change’ through the oceans of the world and through Coral Triangle and Pacific Island communities where some 200 million people are sustained by tropical fisheries.

So what will all these people do when the ice melts?

UNESCO predicts that over 100-150 million people in S.E. Asia alone will be displaced through shoreline erosion, rising sea level, drought, and food shortages by 2050.

Can’t we just increase agricultural output?

By 2007 approximately 40% of the world's agricultural land was already seriously degraded. If current trends of soil degradation continue as they are in Africa, underdeveloped countries might be able to feed just 25% of their population by 2025 (based on UNU's Ghana-based Institute for Natural Resources in Africa).

Unprecedented migrations of people due to climate change are likely from rural areas to cities and from developing to more developed countries. It has been argued that environmental degradation in some countries will lead to political and military conflict as resources become scarce (Scott, et al. 2001). Even the simple case of oil reaching $100 a barrel coinciding with drought in 2007 pushed up the prices of grains and meats and caused food riots in 40 countries threatening governments as well as social stability in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America and the Caribbean.

 
 Polar bears may only be the first in a long list of disappearing species


As I sit at my computer and look at images of Polar Bears treading across broken pieces of ice I think of what we have done and wonder what will be their future. Am I watching the curtain call for the bears or am I looking at the preview of an environmental apocalypse that I helped create but now am too foolish to stop?

This report was published 14 June, 2013 in the Epoch Times.


Younger readers might enjoy learning more about marine life through Ocean Adventurer.